post #9

In the report from the CNN, the news anchors explained how wrong it was that people outed her to the public. Exposing her for being a porn star is one thing but exposing where she lives, what her email and phone number is, is an invasion of her privacy. They also discussed how it was ironic that they were slut shaming her and calling her every name in the book. The anchors also mentioned that there is an obvious fear of sexuality, which is part of the reason a lot of people are attacking her about it.  On the CNN report they had Michelle Golland video in and she thought that the student was a "bad bitch." Golland also explains that she has control of her sexual life and she gets to chose what she does with it. although the report does support her in some aspects, they also kind of attack her. They mentioned how it was wrong that she was constantly lying to her parents about it. So it seems that there is a lot of mixed emotions abut expressing sexuality and participating in pornography.

The View had some of the same feelings about the whole situation. Although they weren't directly coming at her, one of the hosts was concerned and saddened that she feels empowered by participating in pornography. Other than that the hosts were very curious and asked her a lot questions about how much she makes, why she does it, when she started watching porn, etc. The Views program on her was more about letting her tell her story since she was actually there. I think these two reports were more alike than different because they have the same feelings they were just expressed differently throughout the show!

Comments

  1. I agree that people should not have exposed her personal life to the public. That is potentially putting her at risk for people to find her. She is an adult and can make her own decisions about what she does with her life.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Post #3

post #11

post #10